Steve Ditko was quoted in the New York Post today–sort of. Here’s a link to the original article by Reed Tucker, with the title and subtitle:
Steve Ditko never got his due for co-creating the legendary superhero. And as “The Amazing Spider-Man” hits theaters today, the 84-year-old just wants to be left alone in his Midtown office, toiling away on doodles inspired by Ayn Rand
Ditko experts Tucker quotes in the article include Blake Bell, author of Strange and Stranger: The World of Steve Ditko
Strange and Stranger: The World of Steve Ditko
When Barry Pearl showed me the article this morning, my initial reaction was that Tucker’s headline and spin didn’t fit the Ditko quotes supplied in the article, what Dikto has said elsewhere, or the facts of the situation, and Tucker was reaching to make the facts fit his spin. You can read the article yourself and see if you agree with me.
In the article, Ditko had very little to say when the Post contacted him. When the interviewer asked Ditko if he was paid anything for the four recent Spider-Man movies, Ditko explained, “I haven’t been involved with Spider-Man since the ’60s.” Along similar lines, the article quotes Bell saying,
He could have made a big stink, especially when the first “Spider-Man” movie came out [in 2002], and he probably could have gotten a lot of money and publicity, but he didn’t.
Bell and the Post could have added that one reason Ditko hasn’t raised a stink is because he understands work-for-hire contracts and knew he was working for a per-page rate. But that wouldn’t have fit the spin that “Steve Ditko never got his due.” In point of fact, Marvel and fans alike have been giving Ditko his due since the 1960s. Ditko’s name appeared in the credits of the original run of The Amazing Spider-Man, and the artist himself was showcased in a backup feature in Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1 called “How Stan Lee and Steve Ditko Create Spider-Man!” in October 1964.
Ditko’s name also appeared in the credits of the recent Spider-Man movies. The last item is mentioned but downplayed in Tucker’s article.
I asked Barry if he had anything to add on the article. Barry went to our own resident Ditko Spider-Man expert Nick Caputo, who had this to say:
It’s funny that the author can call Ditko “the J. D. Sallinger of comics” yet knock on his door and speak to him. The author also reinforces stereotypes such as: it’s hard for fans to track Ditko down and that he was never particularly close to anyone he worked with. Why didn’t he speak to Robin Snyder to get another view? Or the many fans who wrote letters to him?
It’s nice to have Ditko’s name recognized as co-creator of Spider-Man, but most articles go down the same road and come up with the same conclusions.